Control over land use is one of the most important powers granted to local officials. Allowing more housing in neighborhoods that have existing amenities or are planned to receive new ones is a powerful and low-cost tool to ensure more Atlantans have access to thriving, walkable neighborhoods that they can afford.
Q: What is your position on increasing the types of housing (duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, cottage courts etc.) that can be built by-right (i.e. without re-zonings)?
A: I am pro middle housing that can be built before any re-zoning measures are pursued.
Q: What parts of your district do you see as priority areas for more dense housing? Please be specific: specific neighborhoods, cross streets, etc.
A: Campbellton Corridor: (1) Delowe & Willis Mill where there are vacant lots near future MARTA BRT stops, business, and the YMCA (2) Cambellton & Mt. Gilead - the Westgate shopping center is another prime area for dense mixed use housing right off the interstate (3) Ben Hill Plaza Shopping Center (3644 Campbellton Rd SW, Atlanta, GA 30331) where this lot is prime for more mixed use density near a key MARTA transit hub (Park & Ride) and has access to the highway. These three nodes can invigorate the district and help drive revenue to the TAD, becoming a true engine of growth for the district.
Q: Are there any parts of your district where you think housing growth should NOT be allowed? Please be specific: specific neighborhoods, cross streets, etc.
A: No, if we are honest about the power of middle housing then there aren't neighborhoods who wouldn't benefit. ADU's, duplexes, garden style apartments, etc can all add housing options without disrupting neighborhood character.
Q: What are you hearing from your potential constituents about their hopes, fears, aspirations, and frustrations about this potential growth?
A: Fear of displacement: (1) From older residents, they receive calls from predatory developers who want to buy them out. This harassment in the face of rising taxes due to growth inhibits their ability to age in place. (2) From younger residents, they worry about stability. Growth translates to higher rents and house prices. In either case, they face unaffordable options that will push them out the district and city.
Q: Oftentimes, proposed developments that could help increase housing supply - including the affordable housing supply - for the City are met with intense local opposition. How will you balance the opinions of existing local neighbors with the overall needs of the City?
A: Residents aren't opposing development out of selfishness, they're protecting their ability to remain in their community. When we ignore these legitimate concerns, we create more opposition to the housing solutions our city desperately needs. I'll prioritize property tax relief for longtime residents, strengthen anti-speculation policies against predatory developers, and focus on middle housing (duplexes, ADUs) that fits neighborhood character while increasing supply. Balance is about real community engagement around creating solutions that protect existing residents while addressing our housing crisis.